Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Problem set 1

These are my solutions to the problem sets assigned to me during the graduate-level quantum mechanics course.

Problem 1

∣φn⟩\left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle are the eigenstates of a Hermitian operator HH (HH is, for example, the Hamiltonian of an arbitrary physical system). Assume that the states ∣φn⟩\left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle form a discrete orthonormal basis. The operator U(m,n)U\left(m,n\right) is defined by:

U(m,n)=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣U\left(m,n\right)=\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|

a) Calculate the adjoint U†(m,n)U^{\dagger}\left(m,n\right) of U(m,n)U\left(m,n\right).

b) Calculate the comutator [H,U(m,n)]\left[H,U\left(m,n\right)\right].

c) Prove the relation U(m,n)U†(p,q)=δnqU(m,p)U\left(m,n\right)U^{\dagger}\left(p,q\right)=\delta_{nq}U\left(m,p\right).

d) Calculate Tr(U)Tr\left(U\right), the trace of the operator U(m,n)U\left(m,n\right).

e) Let AA be an operator, with matrix elements Amn=⟨φm∣A∣φn⟩A_{mn}=\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle. Prove the relation A=∑m,nAmnU(m,n)A=\sum_{m,n}A_{mn}U\left(m,n\right)

f) Show that Apq=Tr(AU†(p,q))A_{pq}=Tr\left(AU^{\dagger}\left(p,q\right)\right).

Escrevendo então o operador hermitiano como:

H=∑kNk∣φk⟩⟨φk∣H=\sum^{N}_{k}k\left|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{k}\right|

a) Para calcular o adjunto partimos de:

U(m,n)=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣U\left(m,n\right)=\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|

Multiplicando por um bra ⟨α∣\left\langle \alpha\right| qualquer à esquerda:

U(m,n)=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣⟨α∣U(m,n)=⟨α∣φm⟩⟨φn∣\begin{align*} U\left(m,n\right) & =\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\\ \left\langle \alpha\right|U\left(m,n\right) & =\left\langle \alpha|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right| \end{align*}

Aplicando o adjunto:

U(m,n)=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣(⟨α∣U(m,n))†=(⟨α∣φm⟩⟨φn∣)†U†(m,n)∣α⟩=∣φn⟩⟨φm∣α⟩U†(m,n)=∣φn⟩⟨φm∣\begin{align*} U\left(m,n\right) & =\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\\ \left(\left\langle \alpha\right|U\left(m,n\right)\right)^{\dagger} & =\left(\left\langle \alpha|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\right)^{\dagger}\\ U^{\dagger}\left(m,n\right)\left|\alpha\right\rangle & =\left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{m}|\alpha\right\rangle \\ U^{\dagger}\left(m,n\right) & =\left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{m}\right| \end{align*}

Obtemos U†(m,n)=U(n,m)U^{\dagger}\left(m,n\right)=U\left(n,m\right).

b)

O comutador pode ser escrito:

[H,U(m,n)]=HU(m,n)−U(m,n)H=∑kNk∣φk⟩⟨φk∣φm⟩⟨φn∣−∑kNk∣φm⟩⟨φnφk⟩⟨φk∣\begin{align*} \left[H,U\left(m,n\right)\right] & =HU\left(m,n\right)-U\left(m,n\right)H\\ & =\sum^{N}_{k}k\left|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{k}|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|-\sum^{N}_{k}k\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{k}\right| \end{align*}

Como ⟨φi∣φj⟩=δij\left\langle \varphi_{i}|\varphi_{j}\right\rangle =\delta_{ij}

[H,U(m,n)]=m∣φm⟩⟨φn∣−n∣φm⟩⟨φn∣=(m−n)∣φm⟩⟨φn∣\begin{align*} \left[H,U\left(m,n\right)\right] & =m\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|-n\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\\ & =\left(m-n\right)\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right| \end{align*}

Então [H,U(m,n)]=(m−n)U(m,n)\left[H,U\left(m,n\right)\right]=\left(m-n\right)U\left(m,n\right).

c)

Este é um cálculo bem direto, utilizando os resultados anteriores:

U(m,n)U†(p,q)=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣(∣φp⟩⟨φq∣)†=∣φm⟩⟨φn∣φq⟩⟨φp∣=δnq∣φm⟩⟨φp∣\begin{align*} U\left(m,n\right)U^{\dagger}\left(p,q\right) & =\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\left(\left|\varphi_{p}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{q}\right|\right)^{\dagger}\\ & =\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}\right|\\ & =\delta_{nq}\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}\right| \end{align*}

Logo U(m,n)U†(p,q)=δnqU(m,p)U\left(m,n\right)U^{\dagger}\left(p,q\right)=\delta_{nq}U\left(m,p\right).

d)

Sendo que {∣φn⟩}\left\{ \left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \right\} forma um conjunto ortonormal, então:

Tr(U(m,n))=Tr(U)=∑kN⟨φk∣U∣φk⟩=∑kN⟨φk∣φm⟩⟨φn∣φk⟩=⟨φn∣φm⟩\begin{align*} Tr\left(U\left(m,n\right)\right) & =Tr\left(U\right)\\ & =\sum^{N}_{k}\left\langle \varphi_{k}\left|U\right|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \\ & =\sum^{N}_{k}\left\langle \varphi_{k}|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \\ & =\left\langle \varphi_{n}|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \end{align*}

Obtemos Tr(U(m,n))=δnmTr\left(U\left(m,n\right)\right)=\delta_{nm}.

e)

Este resultado pode ser obtido de uma maneira bem direta sendo Amn=⟨φm∣A∣φn⟩A_{mn}=\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle

A=∑m,nAmnU(m,n)=∑m,n⟨φm∣A∣φn⟩∣φm⟩⟨φn∣=∑m,n∣φm⟩⟨φm∣A∣φn⟩⟨φn∣=(∑m∣φm⟩⟨φm∣)A(∑n∣φn⟩⟨φn∣)=IAI=A\begin{align*} A & =\sum_{m,n}A_{mn}U\left(m,n\right)\\ & =\sum_{m,n}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\\ & =\sum_{m,n}\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\\ & =\left(\sum_{m}\left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{m}\right|\right)A\left(\sum_{n}\left|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}\right|\right)\\ & =\mathbb{I}A\mathbb{I}\\ & =A \end{align*}

f)

A partir de pura manipulação dos termos obtemos que:

Apq=Tr(AU†(p,q))=Tr(AU(q,p))=Tr(∑m,n⟨φm∣A∣φn⟩∣φm⟩⟨φn∣φq⟩⟨φp∣)=Tr(∑m⟨φm∣A∣φq⟩∣φm⟩⟨φp∣)=∑kN⟨φk∣∑m⟨φm∣A∣φq⟩∣φm⟩⟨φp∣∣φk⟩=∑kN∑m⟨φm∣A∣φq⟩⟨φk∣φm⟩⟨φp∣φk⟩=∑m⟨φm∣A∣φq⟩⟨φp∣φm⟩=⟨φp∣A∣φq⟩\begin{align*} A_{pq} & =Tr\left(AU^{\dagger}\left(p,q\right)\right)\\ & =Tr\left(AU\left(q,p\right)\right)\\ & =Tr\left(\sum_{m,n}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{n}\right\rangle \left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{n}|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}\right|\right)\\ & =Tr\left(\sum_{m}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}\right|\right)\\ & =\sum^{N}_{k}\left\langle \varphi_{k}\left|\sum_{m}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}\right|\right|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \\ & =\sum^{N}_{k}\sum_{m}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{k}|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}|\varphi_{k}\right\rangle \\ & =\sum_{m}\left\langle \varphi_{m}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \left\langle \varphi_{p}|\varphi_{m}\right\rangle \\ & =\left\langle \varphi_{p}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle \end{align*}

Logo Apq=⟨φp∣A∣φq⟩A_{pq}=\left\langle \varphi_{p}\left|A\right|\varphi_{q}\right\rangle como queríamos demonstrar.

Problem 2

In a two-dimensional vector space, consider the operator whose matrix, in an orthonormal basis {∣1⟩,∣2⟩}\left\{ \left|1\right\rangle ,\left|2\right\rangle \right\}, is written:

σy=(0−ii0)\sigma_{y}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{array}\right)

a) Is σy\sigma_{y} Hermitian? Calculate its eigenvalues and eigenvectors (giving their normalized expansion in terms of the {∣1⟩,∣2⟩}\left\{ \left|1\right\rangle ,\left|2\right\rangle \right\} basis).

b) Calculate the matrices which represent the projectors onto these eigenvectors. Then verify that they satisfy the orthogonality and closure relations.

c) Same questions for the matrices:

M=(2i2−i23)M=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 3 \end{array}\right)

and, in a three-dimensional space

Ly=ℏ2i(020−2020−20)L_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{2i}\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\sqrt{2} & 0 & \sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\sqrt{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)

a)

Um operador é hermitiano se A=AT‾A=\overline{A^{T}}, então:

σy=(0−ii0)\sigma_{y}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{array}\right)

E:

σy†=(0−ii0)=σy\sigma^{\dagger}_{y}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{array}\right)=\sigma_{y}

Logo é hermitiano. Para calcular os autovalores, fazemos:

det⁡∣−λ−ii−λ∣=λ−1=0\det\left|\begin{array}{cc} -\lambda & -i\\ i & -\lambda \end{array}\right|=\lambda-1=0

Então λ±=±1\lambda_{\pm}=\pm1. E o autovetor associado ao autovalor positivo é:

(−1−ii−1)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} -1 & -i\\ i & -1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Logo −x1−ix2=0-x_{1}-ix_{2}=0 ou x1=−ix2x_{1}=-ix_{2}. De forma que podemos escrever o autovetor como (−i,1)\left(-i,1\right). Escrevendo em temos da base ∣1⟩=(1,0)\left|1\right\rangle =\left(1,0\right) e ∣2⟩=(0,1)\left|2\right\rangle =\left(0,1\right), e normalzando, temos:

∣λ+⟩=−i2∣1⟩+12∣2⟩\left|\lambda_{+}\right\rangle =-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|1\right\rangle +\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left|2\right\rangle

De modo análogo para o outro autovalor:

(1−ii−1)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & -1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

De onde obtemo que x1=ix2x_{1}=ix_{2}, então obtemos (i,1)\left(i,1\right) ou normalizando:

∣λ−⟩=i2∣1⟩+12∣2⟩\left|\lambda_{-}\right\rangle =\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|1\right\rangle +\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left|2\right\rangle

b)

Calcuando então a representação matricial destes projetores:

P+=∣λ+⟩⟨λ+∣P−=∣λ−⟩⟨λ−∣=[−i212][i212]=[i212][−i212]P+=12[1−ii1]P−=12[1i−i1]\begin{align*} P_{+} & =\left|\lambda_{+}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{+}\right| & P_{-} & =\left|\lambda_{-}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{-}\right|\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{c} -\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc} \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right] & & =\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc} -\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right]\\ P_{+} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{-} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\\ -i & 1 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

Temos então os projetores P+=12[1−ii1]P_{+}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & 1 \end{array}\right] e P−=12[1i−i1]P_{-}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\\ -i & 1 \end{array}\right]. Queremos demonstrar a relação de completude

P++P−=12[1−ii1]+12[1i−i1]=12[2002]=[1001]E=I\begin{align*} P_{+}+P_{-} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & 1 \end{array}\right]+\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\\ -i & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0\\ 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right]E\\ & =\mathbb{I} \end{align*}

E a ortogononalidade:

P+⋅P−=12[1−ii1]⋅12[1i−i1]=14[0000]\begin{align*} P_{+}\cdot P_{-} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\\ -i & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

O mesmo se:

P−⋅P+=12[1i−i1]⋅12[1−ii1]=14[0000]\begin{align*} P_{-}\cdot P_{+} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\\ -i & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & -i\\ i & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

c) Repetindo os mesmos passos para outras duas matrizes, primeiro para:

M=(2i2−i23)M=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 3 \end{array}\right)

Verificando se é hermitiano:

M†=(2i2−i23)=MM^{\dagger}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 3 \end{array}\right)=M

Cálculo de autovalores:

det⁡∣2−λi2−i23−λ∣=(2−λ)(3−λ)−2=0\det\left|\begin{array}{cc} 2-\lambda & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 3-\lambda \end{array}\right|=\left(2-\lambda\right)\left(3-\lambda\right)-2=0

Então temos a seguinte equaçaõ de segundo grau λ2−5λ+4=0\lambda^{2}-5\lambda+4=0. Que pode ser facilmente solucionada e obtemos os seguintes autovalores λ∈{4,1}\lambda\in\left\{ 4,1\right\}. Então associado ao auto-valor λ1=4\lambda_{1}=4 temos:

(−2i2−i2−1)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} -2 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & -1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Da primeira linha temos que −2x1+i2x2=0-2x_{1}+i\sqrt{2}x_{2}=0, então x1=ix22x_{1}=\frac{ix_{2}}{\sqrt{2}}. Como as linhas são múltimas entre si por −i2-i\sqrt{2}, escolhendo x2=1x_{2}=1 temos, normaliazndo:

∣λ1⟩=112+1(i2∣1⟩+∣2⟩)=23(i2∣1⟩+∣2⟩)∣λ1⟩=i3∣1⟩+23∣2⟩\begin{align*} \left|\lambda_{1}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}+1}}\left(\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|1\right\rangle +\left|2\right\rangle \right)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left(\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|1\right\rangle +\left|2\right\rangle \right)\\ \left|\lambda_{1}\right\rangle & =\frac{i}{\sqrt{3}}\left|1\right\rangle +\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left|2\right\rangle \end{align*}

De modo análogo para o outro autovalor:

(1i2−i22)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Da primeira linha temos que x1+i2x2=0x_{1}+i\sqrt{2}x_{2}=0, então x1=−i2x2x_{1}=-i\sqrt{2}x_{2}. Novamente as linhas são múltiplas entre si, escolhendo x2=1x_{2}=1 então já normalizando:

∣λ2⟩=12+1(−i2∣1⟩+∣2⟩)=13(−i2∣1⟩+∣2⟩)∣λ2⟩=−i23∣1⟩+13∣2⟩\begin{align*} \left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2+1}}\left(-i\sqrt{2}\left|1\right\rangle +\left|2\right\rangle \right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left(-i\sqrt{2}\left|1\right\rangle +\left|2\right\rangle \right)\\ \left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle & =-i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\left|1\right\rangle +\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\left|2\right\rangle \end{align*}

Calcuando então a representação matricial destes projetores:

P1=∣λ1⟩⟨λ1∣P2=∣λ2⟩⟨λ2∣=[i323][−i323]=[−i2313][i2313]P1=13[1i2−i22]P2=13[2−i2i21]\begin{align*} P_{1} & =\left|\lambda_{1}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{1}\right| & P_{2} & =\left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{2}\right|\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{i}{\sqrt{3}}\\ \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc} -\frac{i}{\sqrt{3}} & \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\end{array}\right] & & =\left[\begin{array}{c} -i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc} i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} & \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\end{array}\right]\\ P_{1} & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right] & P_{2} & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -i\sqrt{2}\\ i\sqrt{2} & 1 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

Temos então os projetores P+=13[1i2−i22]P_{+}=\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right] e P−=13[2−i2i21]P_{-}=\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -i\sqrt{2}\\ i\sqrt{2} & 1 \end{array}\right]. Queremos demonstrar a relação de completude

P1+P2=13[1i2−i22]+13[2−i2i21]=13[3003]=[3003]=I\begin{align*} P_{1}+P_{2} & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right]+\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -i\sqrt{2}\\ i\sqrt{2} & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0\\ 0 & 3 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0\\ 0 & 3 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\mathbb{I} \end{align*}

E a ortogononalidade:

P1⋅P2=13[1i2−i22]⋅13[2−i2i21]=19[0000]\begin{align*} P_{1}\cdot P_{2} & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -i\sqrt{2}\\ i\sqrt{2} & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{9}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

O mesmo se:

P2⋅P1=13[2−i2i21]⋅13[1i2−i22]=19[0000]\begin{align*} P_{2}\cdot P_{1} & =\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -i\sqrt{2}\\ i\sqrt{2} & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{3}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & i\sqrt{2}\\ -i\sqrt{2} & 2 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{9}\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

E por fim, para

Ly=ℏ2i(020−2020−20)L_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{2i}\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\sqrt{2} & 0 & \sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\sqrt{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)

Verificando se é hermitiano:

Ly†=−ℏ2i(0−2020−2020)=ℏ2i(020−2020−20)=LyL^{\dagger}_{y}=-\frac{\hbar}{2i}\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & -\sqrt{2} & 0\\ \sqrt{2} & 0 & -\sqrt{2}\\ 0 & \sqrt{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)=\frac{\hbar}{2i}\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\sqrt{2} & 0 & \sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\sqrt{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)=L_{y}

Cálculo de autovalores:

∣−λℏ2i20−ℏ2i2−λℏ2i20−ℏ2i2−λ∣=(−λ3+ℏ244λ)=(000)\left|\begin{array}{ccc} -\lambda & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & -\lambda & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & -\lambda \end{array}\right|=\left(-\lambda^{3}+\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}4\lambda\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Então temos a seguinte equaçaõ de segundo grau −λ(λ2−ℏ2)=0-\lambda\left(\lambda^{2}-\hbar^{2}\right)=0. Então um autovalor é λ1=0\lambda_{1}=0 e os outros dois são λ=±ℏ\lambda=\pm\hbar. Para o primeiro autovalor, temos então:

(0ℏ2i20−ℏ2i20ℏ2i20−ℏ2i20)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0 & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Da primeira e últim linha temos que x2=0x_{2}=0. E da segunda linha que x1=x3x_{1}=x_{3}. Então para garantir a normalização escolhendo x1=12x_{1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, temoa apenas:

∣λ1⟩=12∣1⟩+12∣3⟩\begin{align*} \left|\lambda_{1}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left|1\right\rangle +\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left|3\right\rangle \end{align*}

De modo análogo para λ2=ℏ\lambda_{2}=\hbar:

(−ℏℏ2i20−ℏ2i2−ℏℏ2i20−ℏ2i2−ℏ)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} -\hbar & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & -\hbar & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & -\hbar \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Então da primeira linha −ℏx1+ℏ2i2x2=0-\hbar x_{1}+\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}x_{2}=0 ou x1=x22ix_{1}=\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}. Fazendo análogo, da terceira linha obtemos que −ℏ2i2x2−ℏx3=0-\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}x_{2}-\hbar x_{3}=0, então x3=−x22ix_{3}=-\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}. Subtituindo ambos na segunda linha então:

−ℏ2i2(x22i)−ℏx2+ℏ2i2(−x22i)=0+ℏ2x2−ℏx2+ℏ2x2=0(ℏ−ℏ)x2=0\begin{align*} -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}\right)-\hbar x_{2}+\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\left(-\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}\right) & =0\\ +\frac{\hbar}{2}x_{2}-\hbar x_{2}+\frac{\hbar}{2}x_{2} & =0\\ \left(\hbar-\hbar\right)x_{2} & =0 \end{align*}

Então x2x_{2} pode ser qualquer valor. Isto é esperado uma vez que a segunda linha (L2L2) pode ser escrito omo uma soma de ambas as outras linhas (L2=1i2(L1−L3))\left(L_{2}=\frac{1}{i\sqrt{2}}\left(L_{1}-L_{3}\right)\right). Escolhendo x2=2ix_{2}=\sqrt{2}i para facilitar, e normalizando, temos:

∣λ2⟩=11+2+1(1∣1⟩+2i∣2⟩−1∣3⟩)∣λ2⟩=12∣1⟩+i2∣2⟩−12∣3⟩\begin{align*} \left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+2+1}}\left(1\left|1\right\rangle +\sqrt{2}i\left|2\right\rangle -1\left|3\right\rangle \right)\\ \left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{2}\left|1\right\rangle +\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|2\right\rangle -\frac{1}{2}\left|3\right\rangle \end{align*}

E para o último auto valor λ3=−ℏ\lambda_{3}=-\hbar, temos:

(ℏℏ2i20−ℏ2i2ℏℏ2i20−ℏ2i2ℏ)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} \hbar & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & 0\\ -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & \hbar & \frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\\ 0 & -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2} & \hbar \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Então da primeira linha ℏx1+ℏ2i2x2=0\hbar x_{1}+\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}x_{2}=0 ou x1=−x22ix_{1}=-\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}. Fazendo análogo, da terceira linha obtemos que −ℏ2i2x2+ℏx3=0-\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}x_{2}+\hbar x_{3}=0, então x3=x22ix_{3}=\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}. Subtituindo ambos na segunda linha então:

−ℏ2i2(−x22i)+ℏx2+ℏ2i2(x22i)=0−ℏ2x2+ℏx2−ℏ2x2=0(ℏ−ℏ)x2=0\begin{align*} -\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\left(-\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}\right)+\hbar x_{2}+\frac{\hbar}{2i}\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{x_{2}}{\sqrt{2}i}\right) & =0\\ -\frac{\hbar}{2}x_{2}+\hbar x_{2}-\frac{\hbar}{2}x_{2} & =0\\ \left(\hbar-\hbar\right)x_{2} & =0 \end{align*}

Análogo ao caso anterior, escolhendo x2=2ix_{2}=\sqrt{2}i para facilitar, e normalizando, temos:

∣λ3⟩=11+2+1(−∣1⟩+2i∣2⟩+∣3⟩)∣λ3⟩=−12∣1⟩+i2∣2⟩+12∣3⟩\begin{align*} \left|\lambda_{3}\right\rangle & =\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+2+1}}\left(-\left|1\right\rangle +\sqrt{2}i\left|2\right\rangle +\left|3\right\rangle \right)\\ \left|\lambda_{3}\right\rangle & =-\frac{1}{2}\left|1\right\rangle +\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\left|2\right\rangle +\frac{1}{2}\left|3\right\rangle \end{align*}

Calcuando então a representação matricial destes projetores:

P1=∣λ1⟩⟨λ1∣P2=∣λ2⟩⟨λ2∣P3=∣λ3⟩⟨λ3∣=[12012][12012]=[12i2−12][12−i2−12]=[−12i212][−12−i212]P1=12[101000101]P2=14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]P2=14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]\begin{align*} P_{1} & =\left|\lambda_{1}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{1}\right| & P_{2} & =\left|\lambda_{2}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{2}\right| & P_{3} & =\left|\lambda_{3}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{3}\right|\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ 0\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right] & & =\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{2}\\ \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{-1}{2} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{-1}{2}\end{array}\right] & & =\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{-1}{2}\\ \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc} \frac{-1}{2} & \frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2}\end{array}\right]\\ P_{1} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{2} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{2} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

Queremos demonstrar a relação de completude

P1+P2+P3=12[101000101]+14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]+14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]=14[400040004]=[100010002]=I\begin{align*} P_{1}+P_{2}+P_{3} & =\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 1 \end{array}\right]+\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]+\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 4 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 4 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\mathbb{I} \end{align*}

E a ortogononalidade:

P1⋅P2=14[202000202]⋅14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]P2⋅P1=14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]⋅14[202000202]=116[000000000]=116[000000000]\begin{align*} P_{1}\cdot P_{2} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & 2\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{2}\cdot P_{1} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & 2\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] & & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}
P1⋅P3=14[202000202]⋅14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]P3⋅P1=14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]⋅14[202000202]=116[000000000]=116[000000000]\begin{align*} P_{1}\cdot P_{3} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & 2\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{3}\cdot P_{1} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & 2\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 0 & 2 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] & & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

E por fim:

P2⋅P3=14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]⋅14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]P3⋅P2=14[12i2−1−2i222i2−1−2i21]⋅14[1−2i2−12i22−2i2−12i21]=116[1−2i−12i2−2−12i1][12i−1−2i22i−12i1]=116[12i−1−2i22i−1−2i1][1−2i−12i2−2i−12i1]=116[000000000]=116[000000000]\begin{align*} P_{2}\cdot P_{3} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right] & P_{3}\cdot P_{2} & =\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{-2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\cdot\frac{1}{4}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & -1\\ \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 2 & -\frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}}\\ -1 & \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2}} & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\sqrt{2}i & -1\\ \sqrt{2}i & 2 & -\sqrt{2}\\ -1 & \sqrt{2}i & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \sqrt{2}i & -1\\ -\sqrt{2}i & 2 & \sqrt{2}i\\ -1 & \sqrt{2}i & 1 \end{array}\right] & & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \sqrt{2}i & -1\\ -\sqrt{2}i & 2 & \sqrt{2}i\\ -1 & -\sqrt{2}i & 1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & -\sqrt{2}i & -1\\ \sqrt{2}i & 2 & -\sqrt{2}i\\ -1 & \sqrt{2}i & 1 \end{array}\right]\\ & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] & & =\frac{1}{16}\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \end{align*}

Problem 3

Consider a three-dimensional ket space. If a certain set of orthonormal kets say, {∣1⟩,∣2⟩,∣3⟩}\left\{ \left|1\right\rangle ,\left|2\right\rangle ,\left|3\right\rangle \right\} are used as the base kets, the operators AA and BB are represented by

A=(a000−a000−a),B=(b0000−ib0ib0)A=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} a & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -a & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -a \end{array}\right),\quad B=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -ib\\ 0 & ib & 0 \end{array}\right)

with aa and bb both real.

a) Obviouly AA exhibits a degenerate spectrum. Does BB also exhibit a degenerate spectrum?

b) Show that AA and BB commute.

c) Find a new set of orthonormal kets which are simultaneous eigenkets of both AA and BB. Specify the eigenvalues of AA and BB for each of the three eigenkets. Does your specification of eigenvalues completely characterize each eigenket?

3)

a)

Começamos calculando os autovalores de B:

det⁡∣b−λ000−λ−ib0ib−λ∣=(b−λ)λ2−b2(b−λ)=0\det\left|\begin{array}{ccc} b-\lambda & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -\lambda & -ib\\ 0 & ib & -\lambda \end{array}\right|=\left(b-\lambda\right)\lambda^{2}-b^{2}\left(b-\lambda\right)=0

Então:

(b−λ)(λ2−b2)=0\left(b-\lambda\right)\left(\lambda^{2}-b^{2}\right)=0

Logo os autovalores são (b,b,−b)\left(b,b,-b\right), pois λ2\lambda^{2} admite ±b\pm b, além disso se λ=b\lambda=b a igualdade também é satisfeita devido ao primeiro termo. Dessa forma podemos afirmar que B também apresenta autovalores degenerados.

b)

Se comutam, então [A,B]=0\left[A,B\right]=0. Podemos verificar diretamente:

[A,B]=AB−BA=(a000−a000−a)(b0000−ib0ib0)−(b0000−ib0ib0)(a000−a000−a)=(ab0000aib0−aib0)−(ba0000iba0−iba0)\begin{align*} \left[A,B\right] & =AB-BA\\ & =\left(\begin{array}{ccc} a & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -a & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -a \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -ib\\ 0 & ib & 0 \end{array}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{ccc} b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -ib\\ 0 & ib & 0 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} a & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -a & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -a \end{array}\right)\\ & =\left(\begin{array}{ccc} ab & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & aib\\ 0 & -aib & 0 \end{array}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{ccc} ba & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & iba\\ 0 & -iba & 0 \end{array}\right) \end{align*}

Logo [A,B]=0\left[A,B\right]=0 como gostaríamos de demonstrar.

c)

Por fim, queremos um conjunto de kets ortonormai que sejam autokets simultaneamente de ambos. Os autovetores de AA, para a+=aa_{+}=a

(0000−2a000−2a)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -2a & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -2a \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Então ∣a+⟩=(x,0,0)\left|a_{+}\right\rangle =\left(x,0,0\right), pois temos 0⋅x1=00\cdot x_{1}=0 então x1x_{1}pode assumir qualquer valor, mas −2a⋅x2=0-2a\cdot x_{2}=0, então se a≠0a\neq0, necessariamente x2=0x_{2}=0, o mesmo vale para x3x_{3}. Situações análogas serão encontradas nos outros cálculos de autovetores. Repetindo então o processo para a−=aa_{-}=a, obtemos:

(2a00000000)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 2a & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

O que nos retorna um autovetor do tipo ∣a−⟩=(0,x1,x2)\left|a_{-}\right\rangle =\left(0,x_{1},x_{2}\right). Para a matriz B, temos para b+=bb_{+}=b:

(0000−b−ib0ib−b)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -b & -ib\\ 0 & ib & -b \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

De onde obtemos que −bx2−ibx3=0-bx_{2}-ibx_{3}=0 ou xx=−ix3x_{x}=-ix_{3}. Então ∣b+⟩=(x1,−ix3,x3)\left|b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(x_{1},-ix_{3},x_{3}\right). E para b−=−bb_{-}=-b:

(2b000b−ib0ibb)(x1x2x3)=(000)\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 2b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & b & -ib\\ 0 & ib & b \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2}\\ x_{3} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

De onde obtemos que bx2−ibx3=0bx_{2}-ibx_{3}=0 ou xx=ix3x_{x}=ix_{3}. Então ∣b−⟩=(0,ix3,x3)\left|b_{-}\right\rangle =\left(0,ix_{3},x_{3}\right). Sintetizando os autovetore que reunimos até aqui:

Alteramos as notações de xix_{i} pra aia_{i} ou bib_{i}para facilitar a discussão subsequente. Lembrando que precisamos achar 3 autovetores ortonormalizados para ambas matrizes ao mesmo tempo, o primeiro passo óbvio é relaionar ∣a−⟩\left|a_{-}\right\rangle e ∣b−⟩\left|b_{-}\right\rangle, pois ambos não possuem o primeiro elemento. Escolhendo então a2=ib3a_{2}=ib_{3} e a3=b3a_{3}=b_{3}, temos o seguinte autovetor:

∣a−,b−⟩=(0,ib3,b3)\left|a_{-},b_{-}\right\rangle =\left(0,ib_{3},b_{3}\right)

Para garantir a normalização então fazendo b3=12b_{3}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}:

∣a−,b−⟩=(0,i2,12)\left|a_{-},b_{-}\right\rangle =\left(0,\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)

Uma vez que ⟨a−,b−∣a−,b−⟩=1\sqrt{\left\langle a_{-},b_{-}|a_{-},b_{-}\right\rangle }=1. De maneira análoga agora vamo associar ∣a+⟩\left|a_{+}\right\ranglee ∣b+⟩\left|b_{+}\right\rangle. Para isobasta fazer a1=b1a_{1}=b_{1} e b2=0b_{2}=0. Então:

∣a+,b+⟩=(b1,0,0)\left|a_{+},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(b_{1},0,0\right)

A normalização neste caso é trivial b1=1b_{1}=1. Então temos:

∣a+,b+⟩=(1,0,0)\left|a_{+},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(1,0,0\right)

Por fim nos resta apenas os autovalores degenerados de cada matriz, ou seja, os autovetores ∣a−⟩\left|a_{-}\right\ranglee ∣b+⟩\left|b_{+}\right\rangle. Aqui basta fazermos b1=0b_{1}=0, a2=−ib2a_{2}=-ib_{2} e a3=b2a_{3}=b_{2}. Isto é:

∣a−,b+⟩=(0,−ib2,b2)\left|a_{-},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(0,-ib_{2},b_{2}\right)

Fazendo novamente b2=12b_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}para garantir a normalização então:

∣a−,b+⟩=(0,−i2,12)\left|a_{-},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(0,\frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)

Assim temos o seguinte conjunto de autovetores associados aos respectivos autovalores:

∣a−,b−⟩=12(0,i,1)∣a+,b+⟩=(1,0,0)∣a−,b+⟩=12(0,−i,1)\left|a_{-},b_{-}\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(0,i,1\right)\qquad\left|a_{+},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left(1,0,0\right)\qquad\left|a_{-},b_{+}\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(0,-i,1\right)

Além de serem normalizados são ortogonais umavez que ⟨a−,b−∣a+,b+⟩=⟨a−,b−∣a−,b+⟩=⟨a−,b+∣a+,b+⟩=0\left\langle a_{-},b_{-}|a_{+},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left\langle a_{-},b_{-}|a_{-},b_{+}\right\rangle =\left\langle a_{-},b_{+}|a_{+},b_{+}\right\rangle =0. E os dois índices nos permitem identificar a quais autovalores estão associados apesar da degenerecência dos autovalores em cada matriz.

Problem 4

The σx\sigma_{x} matrix is defined by:

σx=(0110)\sigma_{x}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right)

Prove the relation:

eiασx=Icos⁡α+iσxsin⁡αe^{i\alpha\sigma_{x}}=\mathbb{I}\cos\alpha+i\sigma_{x}\sin\alpha

where I\mathbb{I} is the 2×22\times2 unit matrix.

Primeir verificaremos se σx\sigma_{x} é uma matriz hermitiana:

σx†=(0110)=σx\sigma^{\dagger}_{x}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right)=\sigma_{x}

Logo então f(σx)=∑if(λi)∣λi⟩⟨λi∣f\left(\sigma_{x}\right)=\sum_{i}f\left(\lambda_{i}\right)\left|\lambda_{i}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{i}\right|. Os autovalores são então λ±=±1\lambda_{\pm}=\pm1. E os autovetores associados são: primeiro a λ+=+1\lambda_{+}=+1

(−111−1)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} -1 & 1\\ 1 & -1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Temos então x1=x2x_{1}=x_{2}, logo podemo escrever ∣λ+⟩=(12,12)\left|\lambda_{+}\right\rangle =\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right). E a λ−=−1\lambda_{-}=-1:

(1111)(x1x2)=(00)\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1\\ 1 & 1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} x_{1}\\ x_{2} \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \end{array}\right)

Um resultado similar onde x1=−x2x_{1}=-x_{2}: ∣λ−⟩=(−12,12).\left|\lambda_{-}\right\rangle =\left(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right). Podemos escrever então o operador como:

σx=λ+∣λ+⟩⟨λi+∣+λ−∣λ−⟩⟨λi−∣=(+1)(1212)(1212)+(−1)(−1212)(−1212)=(+1)(12121212)+(−1)(12−12−1212)\begin{align*} \sigma_{x} & =\lambda_{+}\left|\lambda_{+}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{i+}\right|+\lambda_{-}\left|\lambda_{-}\right\rangle \left\langle \lambda_{i-}\right|\\ & =\left(+1\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right)+\left(-1\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc} -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{array}\right)\\ & =\left(+1\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right)+\left(-1\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2}\\ -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right) \end{align*}

Sendo então f(x)=eiαxf\left(x\right)=e^{i\alpha x}, aplicando em nosso operador, temos:

eiασx=eiα(12121212)+e−iα(12−12−1212)=(eiα+e−iα2eiα−e−iα2eiα−e−iα2eiα+e−iα2)=(eiα+e−iα200eiα+e−iα2)+(0eiα−e−iα2eiα−e−iα20)=eiα+e−iα2(1001)+eiα−e−iα2(0110)=eiα+e−iα2I+eiα−e−iα2σx\begin{align*} e^{i\alpha\sigma_{x}} & =e^{i\alpha}\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right)+e^{-i\alpha}\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2}\\ -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right)\\ & =\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2} & \frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\\ \frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2} & \frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2} \end{array}\right)\\ & =\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2} & 0\\ 0 & \frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2} \end{array}\right)+\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & \frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\\ \frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2} & 0 \end{array}\right)\\ & =\frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right)+\frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right)\\ & =\frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\mathbb{I}+\frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2}\sigma_{x} \end{align*}

Usando então as relações trigonométricas cos⁡(α)=eiα+e−iα2\cos\left(\alpha\right)=\frac{e^{i\alpha}+e^{-i\alpha}}{2} e sin⁡(α)=eiα−e−iα2i\sin\left(\alpha\right)=\frac{e^{i\alpha}-e^{-i\alpha}}{2i}, obteoms a relação desejada:

eiασx=cos⁡αI+iσxsin⁡(α)e^{i\alpha\sigma_{x}}=\mathbb{\cos\alpha I}+i\sigma_{x}\sin\left(\alpha\right)